Santana Minerals has applied to mine gold at Bendigo, New Zealand, but faces legal challenges. Claims of potential Treaty law breaches could lead to a court battle over the proposed Bendigo-Ophir project.
Kā Rūnaka and four Ngāi Tahu rūnanga have jointly objected to the mine on Treaty grounds. They argue that Santana failed to consult iwi appropriately before applying. Furthermore, a significant part of the land proposed for mining is protected by a government conservation covenant.
The fast-track panel is scheduled to open its hearings at Ōtākou Marae. This panel is expected to make a final decision on the mine in October 2026.
Local vineyard owner Hayden Johnston asserts that the mine would ruin the region’s reputation for pinot noir. He stated that “the scale, nature, and permanence of this mining project make it completely inappropriate.” He believes coexistence of viticulture and mining is fundamentally incompatible.
Ngāi Tahu is seeking $180 million if the plan goes ahead. The proposed mine could employ hundreds and generate $6 billion in revenue, including $1 billion in taxes and royalties for New Zealand.
Santana Minerals contends that it has engaged constructively with iwi and stakeholders. However, some residents’ solicitors claim the application lacks detail and is not decision-ready.
Christopher Finlayson KC emphasized the importance of consultation: “You have to give people time to absorb the information, provide the information and be open to changing your mind, depending on the consultation process.” Their views are still relevant to your considerations as this case unfolds.
The exact legal implications of the claimed Treaty law breach are unclear. The community awaits further developments as hearings begin.
